They compared the move to a “Circus Act” and criticized the director’s legal team for suggesting that the lively deposit was transformed into an event in ticket to the Madison Square Garden.

The assignment of Taylor Swift is linked to the defamation trial of $ 400 million from Justin Baldoni filed in January against Blake Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds.

On Friday, it was confirmed that the Baldoni team had made a summons to Taylor Swift in his current trial against him by his friend, Lively.

Now, a representative of the actress has come out to slam the move, while also criticizing the suggestion of the Baldoni lawyer to sell tickets to the deposit and give the product to organizations supporting the victims of domestic violence.

“Mr. Baldoni, Mr. Sarowitz and the team continue to transform a case of sexual harassment and reprisals for entertainment for tabloids, going as far as they sell tickets for a concert place – Madison Square Garden – to attend the deposit of Ms. Lively People magazine.

The representative also said that the current affair is a “very serious legal affair”, not a “circus” in which the Baldoni legal team seems to try to transform it.

The representative then turned to the criticism of Baldoni and the other parts of the pursuit of sexual harassment, which had previously opposed the request of Lively to reject the defamation of Baldoni against his “he ends with the American co-star”.

“The accused continue to intimidate, intimidate, shame and publicly attack the rights and reputation of women. Including in the last month, seeking to get rid of all, a powerful law on the rights of the victims of California, appeal” unconstitutional “,” continued the representative.

They also pointed out: “The disturbing actions of a billionaire, men who have made their careers as” female allies “and their team, continue to show their real colors”.

In their request for the rejection of the defamation pursuit of Baldoni, the Lively legal team cited the law on survivors of protection against armed defamation, which was implemented in 2023 to protect the accusers of harassment of defamation complaints in recovery.

However, Baldoni lawyers have rejected, arguing that the appeal of the law would establish a “dangerous precedent” and threaten the right of the director’s first amendment to challenge what they described as “false and harmful” accusations of Lively, according to Variety.

Meanwhile, a Swift spokesperson responded to the relaxation delivered to the pop star.

They said People magazine What Swift has never visited the shooting for this ends with us, the film in which Lively and Baldoni played and where the alleged sexual harassment incident occurred.

The representative also declared that Swift had had no involvement in any of the “casting or creation decisions”, which seems to refute Baldoni’s assertion that he was summoned in the Penthouse of Lively in New York, where her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and Swift allegedly congratulated the Lively version of a scene of the film.

“She did not score the film, she has never seen editing or notes on the film, she did not even see that she ends with us in the week after her public release, and traveled around the world in 2023 and 2024 at the head of the biggest tour in history,” said the representative of Swift on pop star.

Currently, the trial on sexual harassment is scheduled for March 9, 2026, without authorized cameras during the procedure.

When the trial begins, Baldoni should take a stand, as confirmed by his lawyer, Bryan Freedman.

Similarly, Lively will testify alongside other people whom her legal team believed that he had witnessed or known “the misconduct which is relevant” for his assertions.