An expert nicknamed it a “bloodbath” and a confirmation that working with the couple is toxic.

Another suggested that some of the previous work and personal decisions of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle could have forced these staff members to “seek elsewhere”.

After a new wave of resignations struck the Harry and Meghan team, a renewed speculation on the working environment of the whirlwind.

The Sussexes have undergone the loss of the deputy under-secretary of assistant press based in Los Angeles, Kyle Boulia, a British press agent, Charlie Gipson, and two other people in recent weeks, the first two spending barely more than a year at work before leaving.

Now, British royal expert Hilary Fordwich has described the turnover of “bloodbath”, saying that he has confirmed that working with the couple is toxic, as the previous reports suggest.

“This is another indication of dysfunction and instability in their household,” she said Digital Fox News About the Royal duo.

“Professionals highly qualified by many first -rate companies have already struggled to prosper under the Sussex,” added Fordwich. “This last bloodbath serves as a solid confirmation.”

Another expert, Richard Fitzwilliams, revealed that the number of people who had left the employment of Harry and Meghan approached two dozen. He also speculated on the reasons why these individuals left.

“There are those who bind this to the reputation that Meghan has difficult to work,” said the Royal expert. “There could be another reason – Sussex are often awful for making plans.”

Reflecting further on the reshuffle of the staff, Fitzwilliams referred to the previous work and the personal decisions taken by the couple who may have inspired their staff to “look elsewhere”.

“On the one hand, it was always clear that a series like” Polo “for Netflix flopped. However, they have always gone forward. On the other hand, it is very unlikely that Harry took advice before his appearance on the BBC [in May] After losing his security file, “he said.

“I would like [also] I love knowing who informed them that it was logical to publish the “Twerking video”, added Fitzwilliams, referring to the viral dance video of a pregnant Meghan, turned just before giving birth to Princess Lilibet.

Despite the massive reshuffle, more should arrive in the future. “Something tells me that there will be another change in the future,” shared an initiate with Hello magazine!

“Meghan and Harry hired some of the most incredible people at the top of their fields, but somehow never works,” added the source.

But for the moment, it seems that it is a case of more people who arrive than to go out, as suggested by Meredith Maines, the director of communications of Harry and Meghan, who supervises the overhaul.

“As the commercial and philanthropic interests of the Duke and Duchess increase, I made the strategic decision to progress towards a more traditional communication structure of the support of specialized agencies, as indicated above in Forbes and the week of public relations several weeks ago,” said Maines in a statement earlier in the month, according to People magazine.

“The transition from a team of two to support staff from the eight-year-old agency, operating in five different time zones, will give the international media and stakeholders better access, and faster response times to investigations,” she added.

In the midst of the changes to their staff, Harry and Meghan were absent from the color of color after being apparently invited to the annual military parade organized to celebrate the official anniversary of King Charles.

The last time the couple attended the event was in 2022, during the Platinum jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II. Even then, they were not allowed on the main royal balcony and rather looked from a separate area reserved for non -workers’ Royals.

In the light of exclusion, the royal commentator Richard Eden said that the decision not to invite the duo to the event and others similar highlight the fault of the deepening between Harry and other senior royals.