Blake LivelyThe reaction to a judge rejecting Justin BaldoniThe complaint against it was revealed after months of legal combat between the pair.

The actress’s lawyers marked the decision “a total victory” and a “complete justification” for Lively, because the judge shared certain points while explaining his decisions.

The legal victory of Blake Lively against Justin Baldoni comes after admitting having faced the “lower of the stockings” of his life this year.

Lively continued Baldoni in December 2024, alleging that he had sexually harassed her on the set of their film, “It Ends with Us”, where they both played roles.

The actor-director responded with a counter-combination of $ 400 million, alleging that Lively and her husband tried to usurp the film’s film.

However, a judge has now rejected the Baldoni trial against the actress and, according to the Daily mail,, A source close to Lively revealed that she had “cried with relief” by learning the bomb decision.

“Complete Elation of the world of Blake and a monkey on his back,” said the initiate. “Blake is pushing a relief right now, and all tears are happy tears.”

In his decision to throw the counter-communion of Baldoni, judge Lewis Liman explained that all the allegations of Lively were made in the privileged court documents.

“The Wayfarer parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for declarations other than the declarations of his CRD complaint, which are privileged,” he said, according to Breath. “The Wayfarer parties allegedly allegedly Reynolds and [publicist Leslie] Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer parties of engaging in a defamation campaign. “”

Liman added: “But the Wayfarer parties did not allege that Reynolds, Sloane or Times would have seriously doubted that these declarations were true on the basis of the information that has them, as is necessary for them to be responsible for the defamation under the applicable law.”

“The additional complaints from Wayfarer parties also fail. Consequently, the modified complaint must be rejected in its entirety,” added the judge.

In the decision of judge Liman, he stressed that the New York Times had no clear “reason” for prejudices in his declaration of the legal complaint in Lively.

“Times examined the evidence available and reported, perhaps in a dramatized manner, which it believed to have occurred. Times had no obvious reason to promote the version of Lively events,” noted Liman.

Fortunately for Baldoni, the judge said that the “Wayfarer parties” can file a second modified complaint by June 23, 2025.

However, they can only modify the allegations “relevant to allegations of tort interference in the contract and the violation of the implicit alliance”.

Lively lawyers, who seem to be delighted with the decision, described him as “total victory” and “complete justification” for the actress and other people who were dragged in the legal fight.

“As we said from the first day, this trial of” $ 400 million “was an imposture, and the court was born,” continued lawyers in their statement.

They added: “We are impatiently awaiting the next round, which is looking for lawyers, damages and punitive interest damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan and the other Wayfarer parties that have perpetrated this abusive dispute.”